MS720-1K vs Comp-1K-0.1: Which 1,000 lb x 0.1 lb MNM Force Scale Fits Better?
- pete8781
- Jul 30
- 2 min read
Phone: (832) 290-3120 | Email: mnmscales@yahoo.com
Contact MNM Scales to confirm which indicator, connector, accessories and calibration configuration are supplied with the specific unit you plan to order.
MS720-1K vs Comp-1K-0.1: Two 1,000 lb x 0.1 lb Force Scales Compared
MNM lists both the MS720-1K and Comp-1K-0.1 at 1,000 lb x 0.1 lb with S-type load cells and Peak Hold, but the listings describe different readout/power packages. The right choice is less about capacity—because that is the same—and more about the indicator, portability, intended fixture and how you plan to calibrate or integrate the system.
MS720-1K: rechargeable tension/compression emphasis
The MS720-1K listing emphasizes crane/tension-compression use, a rechargeable indicator and power supply, two eye bolts, RS-232, Peak Hold and a large backlit display. It is attractive for mobile pull-force, winch, cable, hoist and general force-test work where rechargeable operation is convenient. The listing does not identify the exact indicator model.
Comp-1K-0.1: named LP7515 and bench/compression flexibility
The Comp-1K-0.1 explicitly names the LP7515 indicator and lists AC adapter or three AA batteries, a stainless wall-mount bracket, tare/auto-hold, kg/lb/oz units and a blue-backlit LCD. The named indicator gives buyers a public manual and documented calibration sequence, which is useful for bench fixtures, spring testers and equipment that may be serviced in-house.
Side-by-side decision factors
Capacity/readability: both are listed at 1,000 lb x 0.1 lb.
Sensor style: both use alloy-steel S-type load cells; Comp listing also states NTEP for the sensor.
MS720 power: rechargeable battery plus power supply.
Comp-1K power: AC adapter or three AA batteries.
Indicator documentation: Comp explicitly names LP7515; MS720 public listing does not name the indicator model.
Best-fit intent: MS720 leans toward portable tension/pull/hanging work; Comp-1K leans toward documented LP7515 bench/compression and fixture integration, though either may support both directions with correct hardware.
Calibration difference is important
Because Comp-1K-0.1 names LP7515, its documented calibration flow can be followed after confirming the exact indicator version. For MS720-1K, first identify the readout model from the physical label before entering any service menu. Both systems should be verified with a known force and checked at multiple points after calibration or fixture changes.
Which should you choose?
Choose MS720-1K if rechargeable portability and tension/pull-force workflow are the priorities. Choose Comp-1K-0.1 if you specifically want the named LP7515 platform, AA/AC flexibility and easy access to public indicator documentation. If you already own one indicator family, matching existing cables, procedures and spare parts may be more valuable than a small difference in packaging.
FAQ
Do they have the same accuracy?
Both listings state 1,000 lb x 0.1 lb, but real verified performance depends on the individual load cell, indicator setup, mechanics and calibration. Compare actual verification data when accuracy is critical.
Can I swap the indicators between them?
Potentially only after confirming connector/wiring, excitation, signal compatibility and calibration. A different indicator must be configured and calibrated for the load cell; do not assume plug compatibility.
Which is better for spring testing?
Both can work in a properly aligned spring fixture. Comp-1K-0.1 may be attractive when the documented LP7515 calibration flow and bench/wall mounting are useful; MS720 may be preferable when the test stand moves between work areas and rechargeable operation matters.
Comments